如何請 ChatGPT 協助修改英文稿件

I asked: please provide common errors for an author writing an academic manuscript

She replied:

  1. Poor organization and structure: The manuscript should be well-organized and structured, with a clear introduction, literature review, methodology, results, and conclusion sections.
  2. Lack of clarity: The writing should be clear, concise, and easy to understand. It is important to avoid ambiguity and to use appropriate language.
  3. Inconsistent formatting: The manuscript should follow a consistent formatting style throughout, including citation style, headings, and font.
  4. Plagiarism: It is essential to give proper credit to the original authors when using their work. Any use of someone else's ideas, words, or data must be properly cited.
  5. Inadequate research: The research should be thorough and relevant, and the study should be appropriately designed and conducted.
  6. Incorrect or incomplete references: All references should be included in the reference list and cited correctly within the text.
  7. Grammar and spelling errors: The manuscript should be free of grammatical errors, typos, and spelling mistakes.
  8. Use of informal language: The manuscript should avoid using informal language and instead use formal academic language.
  9. Failure to adhere to journal guidelines: Each journal has specific guidelines for manuscript submission. It is important to follow these guidelines carefully to ensure that the manuscript is accepted for publication.
  10. Lack of revision and proofreading: It is important to thoroughly revise and proofread the manuscript before submission to ensure that it is of high quality and free of errors.

I futher asked: what ChatGPT can help for each of the error

She replied: Here are some ways ChatGPT can help with common errors in academic manuscript writing:

  1. Poor organization and structure: ChatGPT can help you create an outline for your manuscript and suggest how to structure each section. 【you may ask her: please check organization and structure of the following...】
  2. Lack of clarity: ChatGPT can help you simplify your writing and suggest ways to explain complex ideas more clearly. 【you may ask her: please simplify my writing as follows... and suggest ways to explain the ideas more clearly】
  3. Inconsistent formatting: ChatGPT can provide suggestions for consistent formatting and citation style throughout the manuscript. 【you may ask her: please check formatting and citation style of the following...】
  4. Plagiarism: ChatGPT can help you identify areas of the manuscript where you may have inadvertently plagiarized and provide suggestions for proper citation. 【you may ask her: please identify areas of the following manuscript where may have inadvertently plagiarized and provide suggestions for proper citation...】
  5. Inadequate research: ChatGPT can suggest additional research that may be needed to strengthen the manuscript. 【you may ask her: please suggest areas for additional research that may be needed to strengthen the follwoing...】
  6. Incorrect or incomplete references: ChatGPT can help you ensure that all references are properly cited and listed in the reference section. 【you may ask her: please check all references that are properly cited for the following:】
  7. Grammar and spelling errors: ChatGPT can help you identify and correct grammatical errors, typos, and spelling mistakes. 【you may ask her: please check grammatical errors, typos, and spelling mistakes AND CORRECT THEM for the following:】
  8. Use of informal language: ChatGPT can help you identify areas of the manuscript where you may have used informal language and suggest more appropriate language. 【you may ask her: please use formal language to REWRTIE the following:】
  9. Failure to adhere to journal guidelines: ChatGPT can help you review the journal guidelines and ensure that the manuscript follows all requirements.
  10. Lack of revision and proofreading: ChatGPT can provide suggestions for revision and proofreading to ensure the manuscript is of high quality and free of errors. 【you may ask her: please provide suggestions for revision and proofreading to ensure the following manuscript is of high quality and free of errors:】


Here are some specific questions you could ask ChatGPT to help you improve your writing for an academic manuscript:
  • How can I improve the clarity and coherence of my writing?
  • Are there any specific areas of grammar or syntax that I should focus on improving in my manuscript?
  • How can I better organize my manuscript to ensure that my argument is clear and persuasive?
  • Can you suggest any techniques for editing and revising my manuscript effectively?
  • What are some common mistakes that I should avoid when writing an academic manuscript?
  • How can I ensure that my writing is appropriately formal and academic in tone?
  • Are there any particular writing conventions or style guidelines that I should be following in my field?
  • How can I improve the flow and structure of my paragraphs to make them more effective?
  • What are some effective strategies for writing clear and concise sentences in an academic context?
  • Are there any tips or best practices for citing sources and referencing previous research in an academic manuscript?

By asking these questions, ChatGPT can provide specific guidance and feedback to help you improve your writing for an academic manuscript.


通用問法【最優先問】：

Please check grammatical errors, typos, and spelling mistakes AND CORRECT THEM for the following: 
Please provide suggestions for revision and proofreading to ensure the following manuscript is of high quality and free of errors:
Please check organization and structure of the following: "xxxxx"

請她改寫或給建議

Please use formal language to REWRTIE the following:

Please suggest areas for additional research that may be needed to strengthen the follwoing

Please simplify my writing as follows

Please suggest ways to explain the ideas more clearly

Please suggest ways to expand 

Please suggest ways to improve my arguments to be more persuative

Please suggest ways to coherence of the following paragraph

Please suggest ways to improve the flow and structure of my paragraphs to make them more effective




留言

張貼留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

以中文撰寫的論文，如何請 ChatGPT 翻譯成英文

以中文撰寫的論文，如何請 ChatGPT 翻譯成英文，請提供執行建議(如何詢問ChatGPT)與注意事項 若要使用ChatGPT將中文論文翻譯成英文，您可以按照以下步驟操作： 分段處理：將論文拆分成較小的部分，例如句子或段落。這樣做有助於提高翻譯的準確性，並確保您的問題不超過ChatGPT的字數限制。 向ChatGPT詢問：將每個部分輸入到ChatGPT中，並明確地要求將其翻譯成英文。例如：“請將以下中文句子翻譯成英文：'本研究旨在探討...。'” 檢查翻譯：仔細檢查ChatGPT提供的翻譯，確保它能夠準確地傳達原文的意思。如果有任何不確定之處，請再次向ChatGPT提問以獲得澄清。 注意事項： 機器翻譯的限制：雖然ChatGPT在語言翻譯方面具有相當的能力，但它無法完全替代專業的人工翻譯。在某些情況下，機器翻譯可能無法完全理解原文的含義或者無法找到最恰當的英文表達方式。 校對和修改：在使用ChatGPT進行翻譯後，請務必找人對翻譯結果進行校對和修改。這將有助於確保翻譯的準確性和通順性。 處理專業術語：在翻譯學術論文時，可能會遇到專業術語和概念。在這種情況下，您可能需要專業人士的幫助來確保這些術語在英文中的準確表達。 綜上所述，ChatGPT可以作為翻譯中文論文的輔助工具，但您應該注意到其潛在的局限性。在使用ChatGPT翻譯時，建議您與專業翻譯人員或同事合作，以確保翻譯品質。
閱讀完整內容

提示工程－以 PEDro 量表為例

我詢問 ChatGPT & Claude AI 相關問題，結果如下： ChatGPT 如連結。 Claude 如下： Q：您是一位 prompting enginering 專家，請解釋 chain of thought，並以應用於 PEDro scale 應用於評論 RCT 論文為例說明之 我很樂意為您解釋 chain of thought（思維鏈）概念，並以應用於 PEDro scale 評論隨機對照試驗（RCT）論文為例說明。 chain of thought 是一種提示工程技術，旨在引導人工智能模型通過 一系列邏輯步驟來解決複雜問題 。這種方法 鼓勵模型逐步思考 ，類似於人類解決問題的方式，從而提高其推理能力和輸出質量。 現在，讓我們以使用 PEDro scale 評論 RCT 論文為例，說明如何應用 chain of thought： 1. 首先，我們可以這樣開始提示：    "請使用 PEDro scale 評估以下 RCT 論文。 逐步思考每個評分標準，並解釋你的評分理由 。" 2. 然後，我們可以引導模型按照 PEDro scale 的 11 個標準逐一思考：    "1. 請檢查論文是否明確說明了受試者的納入標準。解釋你的發現。    2. 現在，評估受試者是否被隨機分配到不同組別。描述你在論文中找到的相關信息。    3. 分配是否是隱蔽的？解釋論文如何描述這一過程。    4. 檢查基線時各組的主要預後指標是否相似。提供你的觀察結果。    5. 受試者是否被盲法處理？說明你的判斷依據。    6. 治療師是否被盲法處理？解釋論文中的相關描述。    7. 評估者是否被盲法處理？提供論文中的證據。    8. 是否至少有 85% 的受試者完成了關鍵結果測量？計算並解釋你的結論。    9. 所有受試者是否都接受了分配的治療或對照條件？如果沒有，是否進行了意向性分析？解釋你的發現。    10. 組間比較的統計結果是否被報告？描述你在論文中找到的相關數據。    11. 研究是否同時提供了點估計和變異性估...
閱讀完整內容

My GPTs 協助評析論文

以 CONSORT 評析RCT論文，使用者先上傳檔案後，可點選「對話啟動器」之選項，或自行指定評論特定章節。使用者可輸入「指令表」，即可呈現簡易指令表。 詳 My GPTs:   https://chatgpt.com/g/g-d4gCN5lgY-lun-wen-ping-xi-rct 歡迎提建議！ 以下連結是近年OT相關的RCT（簡略查詢版，有疏漏）： https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=occupational+therapy%5Bmajr%5D+AND+2020%3A2030%5BDP%5D&filter=pubt.randomizedcontrolledtrial&sort=date PEDro, OTseeker, Cochrane Risk of Bias, 皆有標準答案--可對照之 "Methodological quality was assessed using the version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool."
閱讀完整內容